Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Schultz

Citations

  • 170 Pa. Super. 504
  • 87 A.2d 69
  • 1952 Pa. Super. LEXIS 296

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the trial court’s charge, in which it characterized some facts as being “fairly well proven[,]” was not erroneous because “the fact that a crime had been committed was undisputed; the question was [the] appellant’s connection with it”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rhodes, Hirt, Reno, Dithrich, Ross, Arnold, Gunther

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.