Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 10/6/1977
Commonwealth v. Bailey
Citations
- 378 A.2d 998
- 250 Pa. Super. 402
- 1977 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2509
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- trial court found offenses to merge which did not, permitting trial court to correct error of law did not increase punishment, but merely modified sentence to base it on valid conviction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Spaeth, Watkins, Jacobs, Hoffman, Cercone, Price, Van Voort Spaeth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-06-10· cited 126×
- Commonwealth v. QuinlanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-04-08· cited 107×
- Commonwealth v. MirandaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-03-12· cited 65×
- Commonwealth v. SchillingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-12-23· cited 47×
- Commonwealth v. HarrisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-07-24· cited 38×
- Commonwealth v. VernilleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-02-27· cited 34×
- Commonwealth v. LezinskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-03-23· cited 33×
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-10-26· cited 32×
- Commonwealth v. AdamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-01-31· cited 32×
- Commonwealth v. LovetteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-12-18· cited 23×
- Commonwealth v. PoteeteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-01-18· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-03-31· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. WillettsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-05-02· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. RippySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-04-08· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. LitmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-03-14· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. BrabhamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-07-12· cited 12×
- Commonwealth v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-01-05· cited 9×
- Commonwealth v. PattersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-07-12· cited 9×
- In the Interest of WoodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-05-16· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. StoverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-10-23· cited 8×
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 4,063×
- United States v. BallSupreme Court· 1896-05-25· cited 1,376×
- Stroud v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1919-11-24· cited 398×
- Commonwealth v. LockhartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-11-16· cited 117×
- Commonwealth v. SilvermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-03-18· cited 116×
- Commonwealth v. WronaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-03-18· cited 113×
- Commonwealth v. HendersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-05-04· cited 93×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Holly v. AsheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1951-06-27· cited 78×
- United States v. Frank SaccoSecond Circuit· 1966-10-19· cited 76×
- Commonwealth v. ColemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-04-22· cited 68×
- Commonwealth v. SimmonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-03-31· cited 68×
- Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-03-25· cited 66×
- Commonwealth v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-06-01· cited 55×
- Tinder v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1953-05-25· cited 35×
- Commonwealth v. TomlinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-02-27· cited 31×
- Commonwealth v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-11-16· cited 29×
- Commonwealth v. SchultzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1952-03-18· cited 22×
- Commonwealth v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-03-17· cited 21×
- Commonwealth v. ThomasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-06-22· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.