Skip to main content
· 12/8/2004

Commonwealth v. Rossetti

Citations

  • 863 A.2d 1185
  • 2004 Pa. Super. 465
  • 2004 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4446

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that sentencing court’s decision to impose maximum term sentence is not violative of Blakely
  • holding failure of sentencing court to consider specified factors other than gravity of offense raises a substantial question
  • affirming a statutory maximum sentence imposed after the trial court considered and balanced all of the relevant mitigating and aggravating facts
  • finding Appellant’s bald assertion that sentence was excessive did not raise a substantial question
  • affirming a statutory maximum sentence imposed after the trial court considered and balanced all of the relevant mitigating and aggravating facts
  • affirming a statutory maximum sentence imposed after the trial court considered and balanced all of the relevant mitigating and aggravating facts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stevens, McCaffery, Tamilia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.