· 12/8/2004
Commonwealth v. Rossetti
Citations
- 863 A.2d 1185
- 2004 Pa. Super. 465
- 2004 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4446
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that sentencing court’s decision to impose maximum term sentence is not violative of Blakely
- holding failure of sentencing court to consider specified factors other than gravity of offense raises a substantial question
- affirming a statutory maximum sentence imposed after the trial court considered and balanced all of the relevant mitigating and aggravating facts
- finding Appellant’s bald assertion that sentence was excessive did not raise a substantial question
- affirming a statutory maximum sentence imposed after the trial court considered and balanced all of the relevant mitigating and aggravating facts
- affirming a statutory maximum sentence imposed after the trial court considered and balanced all of the relevant mitigating and aggravating facts
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stevens, McCaffery, Tamilia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.