Commonwealth v. Santiago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no relief due because appellant faded to establish how confidential location would have enhanced his defense
• officer testified that he \feared that disclosure of the precise location would compromise the safety of the individuals at the address\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hollins v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1994-11-15· cited 21×
• Commonwealth v. Steward
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-11-06· cited 8×
• Church v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-05-13· cited 7×
• Commonwealth v. Rodriquez
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-04-03· cited 6×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Carter
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-09-26· cited 146×
• United States v. James Anthony Foster
  D.C. Circuit· 1993-03-02· cited 48×
• United States v. Stanley Harley, United States of America v. Stanley Harley
  D.C. Circuit· 1982-07-16· cited 47×
• Commonwealth v. Novasak
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-04-02· cited 25×