Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Daniels

Citations

  • 422 A.2d 196
  • 281 Pa. Super. 334
  • 1980 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3322

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Commonwealth may carry its burden in a controlled substance prosecution by proving actual or constructive possession alone
  • closely related crimes exception applied because the crimes of possession and possession with intent to deliver “arose from the same transaction and contained a common element”
  • possession of heroin with intent to deliver

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spaeth, Stranahan, Sugerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.