Massachusetts Appeals Court· 10/3/2011
Commonwealth v. Samuel
Citations
- 80 Mass. App. Ct. 560
- 954 N.E.2d 557
- 2011 Mass. App. LEXIS 1239
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- seizure \was necessary to remove the firearm in order to protect life and to prevent injury to others\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court· 2006-05-22· cited 2,237×
- Commonwealth v. Isaiah I.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2007-02-09· cited 156×
- Commonwealth v. YoungMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1981-02-03· cited 152×
- Commonwealth v. AlvaradoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1996-07-23· cited 93×
- Commonwealth v. McDermottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2007-04-13· cited 56×
- Commonwealth v. BettencourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2006-11-07· cited 37×
- Commonwealth v. MorrisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1999-05-04· cited 36×
- Commonwealth v. PerkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2008-03-20· cited 33×
- Ernst v. Bankruptcy Services, Inc.Supreme Court· 2009-04-20· cited 19×
- Commonwealth v. DimarzioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2002-05-13· cited 9×
- Commonwealth v. LindseyMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2008-08-29· cited 6×
- Commonwealth v. DiMarzioMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2001-10-05· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.