Commonwealth v. Raspberry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining “violation must stem from an official municipal policy or custom” to hold government officials liable
• explaining “violation must stem from an official municipal policy or custom” to hold government officials liable
• “supervisors . . . can be held individually liable for . . . failing to supervise or train officers”
• “[Officers’] subjective intentions play no role in resolving the Fourth- Amendment issue. What controls is what an objectively reasonable officer could believe.” (citation omitted)
• “Though Thiel alludes to prior complaints against Baker and Minor, he fails to provide the details necessary for us to determine whether these complaints . . . involved conduct sufficiently similar to what is alleged here . . . .”
• reviewing grant of summary judgment de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).