Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Smith

Citations

  • 206 A.3d 551

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that if a course of conduct is not shown, corruption of minors is a misdemeanor of the first degree
  • stating that while Walker related to the admissibility of expert testimony concerning witness identification, the principle enunciated in that case “is applicable to expert testimony on the dynamics of sexual violence and victim responses to sexual violence”
  • finding that a jury instruction which required the jury to find that the appellant had committed acts on “numerous occasions” that tended to corrupt the victim’s morals was consistent with the ‘course of conduct’ requirement contained in the statute
  • affirming outside guideline and aggravated range sentences where trial court considered PSI, appellant’s rehabilitative needs, need to protect community, and nature and gravity of offense
  • affirming outside-guideline-range sentence where trial court considered PSI, -5- J-S37041-24 appellant’s rehabilitative needs, the need to protect community, and the nature and gravity of offense
  • permitting expert testimony where the expert, having never met the victim or reviewed the records of the case, discussed in general terms victim responses to sexual assault

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stabile, Dubow, Stevens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.