Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Rose

Citations

  • 172 A.3d 1121

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “lay testimony is intended to describe something that jurors otherwise had not been able to experience for themselves, by drawing upon the sensory and experiential observations that the witness made firsthand”
  • holding defendant’s claim in Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b) statement that challenged testimony constituted inadmissible hearsay was waived where trial counsel made bald objection without specificity at trial and focused argument in appellate brief on relevance
  • looking to federal case law discussing F.R.E. 701 and 702 to determine whether a police officer’s testimony was lay opinion admissible pursuant to Pa.R.E. 701

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Panella, Lazarus, Fitzgerald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.