Skip to main content
· 4/23/1982

Commonwealth v. Mokluk

Citations

  • 444 A.2d 1214
  • 298 Pa. Super. 360
  • 1982 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4004

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating: “A trial court normally has discretion to admit out of order evidence in rebuttal of an anticipated defense. This discretion is abused only if it unduly prejudices one of the parties”
  • no harm where violation was unintentional and testimony not affected

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wickersham, Hoffman, Van Voort

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.