Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Baker

Citations

  • 541 A.2d 1381
  • 518 Pa. 145
  • 1988 Pa. LEXIS 169

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding exigent circumstances and considering the factor that the search was conducted when the police stopped a moving vehicle only thirty minutes after a crime was reported
  • “[I]t is not clear that the intrusion arising from immobilization of an automobile is less than the intrusion of searching it.”
  • Police stopped vehicle thirty minutes after tip of a crime and searched vehicle without a warrant
  • Police stopped vehicle thirty minutes after tip of a crime and searched vehicle without a warrant
  • Poliee stop of vehicle thirty minutes after report of crime validated warrantless search given presence of probable cause and exigencies of mobility of vehicle
  • “It is well established that automobiles are not per se unprotected by the warrant requirements of the Fourth Amendment, and of Art. I [sic; 1], § 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Zappala, Papadakos, Stout

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.