Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 5/24/1988
Commonwealth v. Riggins
Citations
- 542 A.2d 1004
- 374 Pa. Super. 243
- 1988 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1622
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- statement that the presumption of innocence is a cloak and “not a shield for the guilty to hide behind” was proper in response to an analogous statement made during defense closing
- statement that the presumption of innocence is a cloak and \not a shield for the guilty to hide behind\ was proper in response to an analogous statement made during defense closing
- The defendant's being a Muslim was relevant with \respect to the identification of the killer\ because the victim's dying declaration identified the defendant \as one of her three assailants and stated that all three were Muslims.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wieand, Montgomery, Hester
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. CottamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-09-17· cited 93×
- Commonwealth v. FrenchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-07-11· cited 67×
- Commonwealth v. SattazahnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-07-30· cited 53×
- Amin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1989-05-19· cited 35×
- Commonwealth v. FioreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-09-20· cited 34×
- Commonwealth v. PurcellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-02-21· cited 34×
- Commonwealth v. BowersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-12-11· cited 29×
- Commonwealth v. MunsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-09-28· cited 28×
- Commonwealth v. GainerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-08-28· cited 24×
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-03-29· cited 24×
- Commonwealth v. CarterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-10-01· cited 22×
- Commonwealth v. GallowaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-04-12· cited 16×
- Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-08-25· cited 15×
- Commonwealth v. GibbsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-08-29· cited 15×
- Commonwealth v. BonaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-03-06· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. McCloySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-04-10· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. ThompsonPhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 1989-04-03
Cites
40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court· 1979-06-18· cited 3,585×
- Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-06-09· cited 2,071×
- Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court· 1985-04-29· cited 2,053×
- MacKey v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1971-04-05· cited 945×
- Allen v. HardySupreme Court· 1986-06-30· cited 521×
- Shea v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1985-02-20· cited 233×
- Commonwealth v. PursellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-06-26· cited 203×
- Yates v. AikenSupreme Court· 1988-01-12· cited 185×
- Commonwealth v. OhleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-12-14· cited 157×
- Commonwealth v. D'AmatoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-05-22· cited 154×
- Commonwealth v. StoykoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-04-17· cited 132×
- Commonwealth v. RigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-04-28· cited 102×
- Commonwealth v. AlbrechtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-06-23· cited 88×
- Commonwealth v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-12-18· cited 86×
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-01-28· cited 78×
- Commonwealth v. MauteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-12-07· cited 61×
- Commonwealth v. NicholsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-05-01· cited 60×
- Commonwealth v. EhrsamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-07-09· cited 57×
- Commonwealth v. GillespieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-10-28· cited 55×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.