Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Brown

Citations

  • 673 A.2d 975
  • 449 Pa. Super. 346
  • 1996 Pa. Super. LEXIS 783

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “numerous cases” have held that admission into an ARD program is not a conviction that may be used for impeachment
  • recognizing that when dealing with statutory mandate, such as section 3731(e)(2), acceptance of ARD is considered a conviction
  • holding that the trial court erred by admitting impeachment evidence of a witness’ prior theft arrest, but that the error was harmless

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wieand, Tamilia, Montemuro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.