Supreme Court of Minnesota· 4/24/1981
State v. Hoyt
Citations
- 304 N.W.2d 884
- 1981 Minn. LEXIS 1259
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing that courts do not decide constitutional questions except when necessary to dispose of case
- stating that constitutional questions are decided only if necessary to dispose of case
- stating “[appellate courts] do not decide constitutional questions except when necessary to do so in order to dispose of the case at bar.”
- finding the defendant’s claim of right was bona fide based upon her testimony
- “A claim of right ... is a defense to a charge of criminal trespass.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Amdahl, Scott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- AFSCME Councils 6, 14, 65 & 96, AFL-CIO v. SundquistSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-09-16· cited 71×
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-06-09· cited 69×
- Reed v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1988-03-15· cited 67×
- State v. BrechonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-08-03· cited 60×
- Tom Johnson v. Patrick McCarverEighth Circuit· 2019-11-01· cited 34×
- State v. AmundsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2013-04-15· cited 18×
- Snilsberg v. Lake Washington ClubCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-07-25· cited 17×
- Special Force Ministries v. WCCO TelevisionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1998-10-13· cited 16×
- In Re Jason Allen D.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1999-07-12· cited 15×
- State v. OcchinoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1997-12-09· cited 14×
- Itasca County Board of Commissioners v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-08-20· cited 12×
- In Re the Welfare of A.K.K.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-10-09· cited 10×
- State v. ReinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1991-11-19· cited 8×
- Strei v. BlaineD. Minnesota· 2014-02-12· cited 8×
- State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2007-09-11· cited 7×
- State v. KuhlmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2006-09-22· cited 6×
- In Re Welfare of Children of N.F.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2007-07-24· cited 6×
- In Re the Risk Level Determination of S.S.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2007-01-16· cited 5×
- Meyer v. LindalaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2004-03-09· cited 4×
- State v. BaumannCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-09-12· cited 4×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Marsh v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1946-01-28· cited 1,049×
- Hudgens v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court· 1976-03-03· cited 720×
- Lloyd Corp. v. TannerSupreme Court· 1972-05-26· cited 611×
- Williams v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1943-09-27· cited 50×
- State v. PaigeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1977-07-08· cited 45×
- Commonwealth v. RichardsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1943-04-26· cited 41×
- Carpenter v. ColesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1898-12-16· cited 24×
- State v. North Star Research & Development InstituteSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1972-07-07· cited 23×
- Minnesota Baptist Convention v. Pillsbury AcademySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1955-12-23· cited 22×
- Keithley v. HettingerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1916-05-12· cited 14×
- State v. QuinnellSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1967-06-09· cited 13×
- Hayes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1913-10-28· cited 10×
- Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. v. City of WinthropSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1977-07-22· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.