Commonwealth v. Reynolds

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court considered fact that police knew defendant had subnormal intelligence in determining that his statement to police was product of coercion
• court considered fact that police knew defendant had subnormal intelligence in determining that his statement to police was product of coercion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Cheatham
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1996-07-30· cited 109×
• Commonwealth v. Bonasorte
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-12-21· cited 45×
• Commonwealth v. Neal
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-08-23· cited 18×
• Commonwealth v. Fleck
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-02-03· cited 17×
• State v. Cleary
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1994-02-28· cited 16×
• Commonwealth v. Sirbaugh
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-10-25· cited 12×
• Commonwealth v. Frison
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-07-02· cited 11×
• Commonwealth v. De George
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-03-07· cited 8×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Fikes v. Alabama
  Supreme Court· 1957-01-14· cited 507×
• Commonwealth v. Kichline
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-07-06· cited 312×
• Commonwealth v. Goodwin
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-03-18· cited 173×
• Commonwealth v. Fogan
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-11-17· cited 104×
• Commonwealth v. Bullard
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-01-29· cited 44×
• Commonwealth v. Butch
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-07-12· cited 25×
• Commonwealth v. Jones
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-11-20· cited 11×