Commonwealth v. De George

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that violation of Rule of Criminal Procedure governing inventory of item seized did not require suppression of evidence
• violation of Rule 2009(a), requiring return of an inventory of the items seized, does not require exclusion of evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).