Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 4/29/1983

Commonwealth v. Russell

Citations

460 A.2d 316
313 Pa. Super. 534
1983 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2979

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that choking the victim, among other circumstances, demonstrated an attempt to inflict serious bodily injury
indicating that choking the victim, among other circumstances, demonstrated an attempt to inflict serious bodily injury
indicating that choking the victim, among other circumstances, demonstrated an attempt to inflict serious bodily injury
explaining that choking a victim is a factor that can demonstrate that a defendant intended and attempted to inflict serious bodily injury on the victim
noting that the choking of a victim may permit an inference of an intent to cause serious bodily injury
stating that the specific intent for burglary “may be established by the defendant’s words or inferred from his conduct or from the attendant circumstances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wickersham, Cirillo, Watkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.