Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Fortune

Citations

  • 346 A.2d 783
  • 464 Pa. 367
  • 1975 Pa. LEXIS 1074

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding for a new trial because “whenever a jury improperly receives evidence of other crimes, the impact is significant”
  • remanding for a new trial because “whenever a jury improperly receives evidence of other crimes, the impact is significant”
  • no logical connection where there is nothing distinctive to separate other acts from common street crimes
  • no logical connection where there is nothing distinctive to separate other acts from common street crimes
  • “The victim … was older and larger than the ‘little boys’ or little kids’ who were the victims of the other incidents.”
  • whenever a jury improperly receives evidence of other crimes, the impact is significant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

72 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.