Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 5/15/1981
Commonwealth v. O'Neal
Citations
- 429 A.2d 1189
- 287 Pa. Super. 238
- 1981 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2695
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a lessee of a home could not consent to a search of a bedroom that was used exclusively by a temporary gratuitous guest because the guest had an expectation of privacy in the bedroom
- holding that a lessee of a home could not consent to a search of a bedroom that was used exclusively by a temporary gratuitous guest because the guest had an expectation of privacy in the bedroom
- holding that a lessee of a home could not consent to a search of a bedroom that was used exclusively by a temporary gratuitous guest because the guest had an expectation of privacy in the bedroom
- holding that a lessee of a home could not consent to a search of a bedroom that was used exclusively by a temporary gratuitous guest because the guest had an expectation of privacy in the bedroom
- declining to penalize appellants’ premature appeal when failure was a result of both their and the court’s failure to follow Rules of Civil Procedure concerning entry of adjudication in an equity action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Spaeth, Cavanaugh, O'Kicki
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hubert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-05-26· cited 294×
- Commonwealth v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-11-24· cited 51×
- Commonwealth v. LowerySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-10-01· cited 43×
- Commonwealth v. KeanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-03-16· cited 34×
- Commonwealth v. HunterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-12-31· cited 20×
- Overnite Transportation Co. v. Teamsters Local 107Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-06-15· cited 2×
- Hubert, Douglas MichaelCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-05-26
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court· 1974-02-20· cited 3,648×
- Stoner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1964-05-18· cited 1,576×
- Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1961-04-03· cited 891×
- Commonwealth v. GarciaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-04-28· cited 69×
- Commonwealth v. LatshawSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-10-05· cited 41×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.