Commonwealth v. Lowery

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in his room because he did not manifest an intent to exclude others
• noting further that “cases dealing with search and seizure in a family setting emphasize the need for overt indications” of privacy expectation
• noting further that \cases dealing with search and seizure in a family setting emphasize the need for overt indications\ of privacy expectation
• property rights, actual usage, and historical distinc tions are all used to determine whether the Fourth Amendment protection applies
• property rights, actual usage, and historical distinctions are all used to determine whether the Fourth Amendment protection applies
• “Property rights, actual usage, and historical distinctions are all used to determine whether the Fourth Amendment right to privacy applies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).