Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Donahue

Citations

  • 549 A.2d 121
  • 519 Pa. 532
  • 1988 Pa. LEXIS 260

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that, for the purpose of proving absence of accident through bad acts that are not “strikingly similar,” the Commonwealth must show that “a similar result obtained in both cases”
  • explaining that, for the purpose of proving absence of accident through bad acts that are not “strikingly similar,” the Commonwealth must show that “a similar result obtained in both cases”
  • admitting evidence that defendant had previously abused another child “as probative” of whether the injuries the child suffered in the case on trial were accidental, as the defendant claimed
  • admitting evidence that defendant had previously abused another child “as probative” of whether the injuries the child suffered in the case on trial were accidental, as the defendant claimed
  • admitting evidence that defendant had previously abused another child “as probative” of whether the injuries the child suffered in the case on trial were accidental, as the defendant claimed
  • affirming holding in Commonwealth v. Shively, 424 A.2d 1257 (Pa. 1981), that remoteness in time between distinct offenses is factor to consider in determining whether admission of evidence of prior crime tends to show that same person committed both crimes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Zappala, Papadakos

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.