Commonwealth v. Monroe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding array was not impermissibly suggestive, even though defendant was the only bald man pictured, because several other subjects had very short haircuts
• under prior rule requiring post verdict motions, argument that verdict was against the weight of the evidence was waived since it was not raised in post-verdict motions
• photo array not impermissibly suggestive where defendant was only bald man in photographs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Burton
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-02-28· cited 45×
• Commonwealth v. Jackson
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-07-12· cited 38×
• Commonwealth v. Bruce
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-08-26· cited 33×
• Commonwealth v. Butler
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-03-17· cited 30×
• Commonwealth v. Rozplochi
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-06-26· cited 29×
• Commonwealth v. Blassingale
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-10-02· cited 23×
• Commonwealth v. Stern
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-05-01· cited 10×
• Commonwealth v. Whiting
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-11-09· cited 7×
• Commonwealth v. Jarecki
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-05-19· cited 5×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Batson v. Kentucky
  Supreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
• Simmons v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1968-03-18· cited 6,700×
• Manson v. Brathwaite
  Supreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 5,119×
• Commonwealth v. McKendrick
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-08-18· cited 50×
• Commonwealth v. McCormick
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-12-08· cited 35×
• Commonwealth v. Griffin
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-10-19· cited 33×
• Commonwealth v. Hammond
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-12-10· cited 27×