Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. McCormick

Citations

  • 519 A.2d 442
  • 359 Pa. Super. 461
  • 1986 Pa. Super. LEXIS 13140

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • retroactive application of Batson limited to cases where the objection to Commonwealth's use of peremptory challenges has been properly preserved
  • retroactive application of Batson limited to cases where the objection to Commonwealth’s use of peremptory challenges has been properly preserved
  • retroactive application of Batson limited to cases where the objection to Commonwealth’s use of peremptory challenges has been properly preserved
  • fact that all black veniremen were peremptorily stricken by Commonwealth raises inference that peremptory challenges were used to discriminate
  • discussing various retroactivity approaches utilized in Pennsylvania
  • Superior Court may not consider dictum

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brosky, Rowley, Popovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.