Commonwealth v. Rozplochi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that there was sufficient evidence to establish the length of a firearm’s barrel from testimony and estimations of size provided by an eyewitness, irrespective of whether the gun was entered into evidence
• noting that there was no evidence indicating gun had an exceptionally long barrel length
• stating that “where a defendant threatens to inflict serious bodily injury on two employees in order to effectuate a theft of property from their common employer, the defendant may be convicted of two counts of robbery.”
• applying the Frisbie rationale to determine whether a defendant commits multiple robberies if he threatens two people while attempting to steal the property of their common employer
• testimony establishing that gun was placed into envelope of certain size sufficient to meet barrel length requirement of Section 6102
• “We hold that where a defendant threatens to inflict serious bodily injury on two employees in order to effectuate a theft of property from their common employer, the defendant may be convicted of two counts of robbery.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).