Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 3/9/1995

Commonwealth v. Miller

Citations

657 A.2d 946
441 Pa. Super. 320
1995 Pa. Super. LEXIS 551

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that there was sufficient evidence of the defendant’s age where the defendant had two daughters from a previous marriage and the - 12 - J-S04044-21 jury had the opportunity to observe the defendant throughout trial
finding circumstantial evidence sufficient to prove appellant’s age where victim identified appellant at trial, jury observed appellant, and evidence was presented that appellant had prior marriage resulting in two daughters
upholding a verdict where the defendant was identified in court, the jury could observe the defendant, and there was circumstantial evidence that the defendant had children from a previous marriage
permitting circumstantial evidence of age in a case of corruption of minors
inconsistent verdicts by a jury will not be disturbed provided the Commonwealth produced sufficient evidence of the crime for which the appellant was convicted
sufficient circumstantial evidence to establish defendant’s age under section 6301 based upon defendant’s physical appearance and testimony that he had been married before and was dating the minor victim’s mother

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rowley, McEwen, Popovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.