Commonwealth v. Peer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that pointing a loaded gun at a victim was sufficient to support REAP conviction
• determining that the jury’s acquittal of lesser included offense did not preclude conviction of the greater offense
• possessing and brandishing a weapon, combined with a struggle over control of the weapon and a threat to kill two people, was sufficient to convict the defendant for recklessly endangering another person
• possessing and brandishing a weapon, combined with a struggle over control of the weapon and a threat to kill two people, was sufficient to convict the defendant for recklessly endangering another person
• Commonwealth exercised due diligence where defendant’s trial was scheduled prior to Rule 1100 run date and crowded criminal docket was sole reason for delay
• Commonwealth exercised due diligence where defendant's trial was scheduled prior to Rule 1100 run date and crowded criminal docket was sole reason for delay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).