Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2/24/2000

Commonwealth v. Miller

Citations

746 A.2d 592
560 Pa. 500
2000 Pa. LEXIS 440

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the appellant was \not entitled to psychiatric assistance to prove the mental health mitigating circumstances\ because future dangerousness was not an issue at trial
holding that claim involving unchallenged evidence was not previously litigated
holding that claim involving unchallenged evidence was not previously litigated
holding capital defendant entitled to state-paid psychiatric assistance only where needed to rebut prosecution's assertion of future dangerousness, not to prove mitigating circumstances
holding capital defendant entitled to state-paid psychiatric assistance only where needed to rebut prosecution’s assertion of future dangerousness, not to prove mitigating circumstances
explaining that this Court will not review a jury charge by taking isolated comments out of context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaherty, Zappala, Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.