Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 5/1/2008

Commonwealth v. Blakeney

Citations

946 A.2d 645
596 Pa. 510
2008 Pa. LEXIS 532

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

requiring that a defendant show that he was \overwhelmed to the point of losing his faculties and sensibilities\ to prove a voluntary intoxication defense
holding that the chest is a vital part of the human body
holding that the trial court did not err in quashing a subpoena duces tecum, where an appellant sought the personnel files of two investigating officers, but could offer no reasonable basis for his request
holding that the trial court did not err in quashing a subpoena duces tecum, where an appellant sought the personnel files of two investigating officers, but could offer no reasonable basis for his request
requiring that a defendant show that he was “overwhelmed to the point of losing his faculties and sensibilities” to prove a voluntary intoxication defense
requiring that a defendant show that he was “overwhelmed to the point of losing his faculties and sensibilities” to prove a voluntary intoxication defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cappy, Castille, Newman, Saylor, Eakin, Baer, Baldwin, Former

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.