Commonwealth v. McMullen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• framing McMullen’s argument as claim that “the court erred by admitting [his] inculpatory statements into evidence” and subsequently holding that “the court erred by admitting [McMullen’s] statement into evidence” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. McMullen
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-02-14· cited 52×
• McMullen v. Tennis
  Third Circuit· 2009-04-01· cited 41×
• Commonwealth v. Chambers
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-05-17· cited 35×
• Commonwealth v. McMullen
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-07-31· cited 35×
• Commonwealth v. Persichini
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-05-02· cited 10×
• Commonwealth v. McMullen
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-11-17· cited 8×
• Kim McMullen v. Franklin Tennis
  Third Circuit· 2009-04-01

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Polimeni
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-10-07· cited 110×
• Commonwealth v. Byrd
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-07-03· cited 73×
• Commonwealth v. Griffin
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-01-28· cited 72×
• Commonwealth v. Leslie
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-03-14· cited 64×
• Commonwealth v. Boykin
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-12-20· cited 55×
• Commonwealth v. Badman
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-10-03· cited 47×
• Commonwealth v. Taraschi
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-04-13· cited 33×
• Commonwealth v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-01-06· cited 24×
• Commonwealth v. Forman
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-05-13· cited 11×