Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Chambers

Citations

  • 852 A.2d 1197
  • 2004 Pa. Super. 171
  • 2004 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1209

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an information need not specify the degrees of homicide or manslaughter in order to sustain a second-degree murder verdict
  • holding that an information need not specify the degrees of homicide or manslaughter in order to sustain a second-degree murder verdict
  • explaining that an information need not specify the degrees of murder in order to sustain a verdict of second-degree murder
  • affirming the denial of an appellant’s PCRA petition claiming that he was not specifically charged with second-degree murder because the criminal information charged him with criminal homicide
  • reviewing challenge to specificity underlying bill of information under the PCRA
  • “An information need not specify a degree of murder or the degrees of manslaughter in order to sustain the verdict of second degree murder.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hudock, Montemuro, Cavanaugh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.