Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 11/8/1985
Commonwealth v. Mathews
Citations
- 500 A.2d 853
- 347 Pa. Super. 320
- 1985 Pa. Super. LEXIS 9931
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- jury rejected defendant’s entrapment defense under statutory objective approach, yet court used due process standard to bar conviction because police conduct was so egregious
- jury rejected defendant's entrapment defense under statutory objective approach, yet court used due process standard to bar conviction because police conduct was so egregious
- law enforcement officers acted outrageously in supplying money, equipment, a residence and expert advice used by appellant to illegally manufacture methamphetamine
- law enforcement officers acted outrageously in supplying money, equipment, a residence and expert advice used by appellant to illegally manufacture methamphetamine
- due process violated where police supplied defendants with money to purchase chemicals necessary to manufacture methamphetamine and to rent residence in which to set up lab, helped them transport necessary equipment to lab and instructed them step by step in manufacturing process
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Spaeth, Rowley, Wieand
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. LivelyWashington Supreme Court· 1996-08-29· cited 166×
- State v. AgrabanteHawaii Supreme Court· 1992-05-13· cited 57×
- Commonwealth v. BoyleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-06-09· cited 54×
- Commonwealth v. DelligattiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-02-11· cited 37×
- Commonwealth v. NelsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-10-19· cited 36×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1992-05-13· cited 35×
- Weaver v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1999-11-04· cited 30×
- Commonwealth v. ManceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-01-11· cited 19×
- Commonwealth v. BenchinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-10-25· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. BonaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-03-06· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. MettsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-12-06· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. LindenmuthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-01-03· cited 13×
- Com. v. SUN CHA CHONSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-11-05· cited 4×
- Commonwealth v. DilibertoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-11-21· cited 1×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court· 1973-04-24· cited 2,012×
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-05-19· cited 1,587×
- Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-04-27· cited 910×
- United States v. William Christopher Twigg, Iii, United States of America v. Henry Alfred NevilleThird Circuit· 1978-11-17· cited 350×
- United States v. Billy W. Gray, Lee Andrew Fennell, Roger Lee Wright, Ronald Cecil Barker and Vance C. DyarFifth Circuit· 1980-09-26· cited 149×
- Commonwealth v. SudlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-10-14· cited 80×
- United States v. Sammy Lee Ward, Edward B. Prows, A/K/A TeddyEleventh Circuit· 1983-02-03· cited 78×
- United States v. Gary Anthony Gianni, Joseph Mike Giardina, Richard Loren Holland, James Robert HamEleventh Circuit· 1982-06-14· cited 63×
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-09-27· cited 55×
- Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-04-27· cited 48×
- Commonwealth v. PortalatinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-11-16· cited 41×
- Commonwealth v. DerrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-07-05· cited 31×
- People v. PepparsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1983-02-09· cited 29×
- Commonwealth v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-04-30· cited 27×
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1984-04-11· cited 14×
- Harrison v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1982-03-18· cited 12×
- Fennell v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-12-08· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. MinnichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-02-10· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.