Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Mathews

Citations

  • 500 A.2d 853
  • 347 Pa. Super. 320
  • 1985 Pa. Super. LEXIS 9931

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • jury rejected defendant’s entrapment defense under statutory objective approach, yet court used due process standard to bar conviction because police conduct was so egregious
  • jury rejected defendant's entrapment defense under statutory objective approach, yet court used due process standard to bar conviction because police conduct was so egregious
  • law enforcement officers acted outrageously in supplying money, equipment, a residence and expert advice used by appellant to illegally manufacture methamphetamine
  • law enforcement officers acted outrageously in supplying money, equipment, a residence and expert advice used by appellant to illegally manufacture methamphetamine
  • due process violated where police supplied defendants with money to purchase chemicals necessary to manufacture methamphetamine and to rent residence in which to set up lab, helped them transport necessary equipment to lab and instructed them step by step in manufacturing process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spaeth, Rowley, Wieand

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.