Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 11/22/2002

Commonwealth v. Marshall

Citations

810 A.2d 1211
570 Pa. 545
2002 Pa. LEXIS 2400

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

rejecting argument based on statistics because \Appellant has failed to provide any link between the findings of this statistical abstract and his particular case\
rejecting argument based on statistics because “Appellant has failed to provide any link between the findings of this statistical abstract and his particular case”
rejecting an appellant's Batson claim based on the McMahon videotape because the claim had no grounding in the particular facts of the appellant's case
“[W]e have explicitly approved of [reasonable doubt] instructions containing the word ‘restrain’ for nearly five decades.” (citations omitted)
“[W]e have explicitly approved of [reasonable doubt] instructions containing the word ‘restrain’ for nearly five decades.” (citations omitted)
“[W]e have explicitly approved of [reasonable doubt] instructions containing the word ‘restrain’ for nearly five decades.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zappala, C.J., and Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor and Eakin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.