Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Liebman

Citations

  • 446 N.E.2d 714
  • 388 Mass. 483
  • 1983 Mass. LEXIS 1314

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing prosecutor’s failure to disclose exculpatory evidence and stating “evidence which impeaches the credibility of a key prosecution witness is exculpatory for the defendant and is clearly material”
  • \[W]hen a judge undertakes to decide if [evidence] benefits the defendant's case he is `assuming vicariously and uncomfortably the role of counsel'\
  • “[W]hen a judge undertakes to decide if [evidence] benefits the defendant’s case he is ‘assuming vicariously and uncomfortably the role of counsel’ ”
  • “[W]hen a judge undertakes to decide if [evidence] benefits the defendant's case he is „assuming vicariously and uncomfortably the role of counsel‟. Commonwealth v. Stockhammer, 409 Mass 867, 570 N.E. 2d, 992 (1991
  • “[W]hen a judge undertakes to decide if [evidence] benefits the defendant's case he is „assuming vicariously and uncomfortably the role of counsel‟. Commonwealth v. Stockhammer, 409 Mass 867, 570 N.E. 2d, 992 (1991

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hennessey, Liacos, Abrams, Lynch, O'Connor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.