Skip to main content
· 2/12/2015

Commonwealth v. Cowels (SJC 11630) Commonwealth v. Mims

Citations

  • 470 Mass. 607

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • new testing conclusively established that blood did not come from either defendants or victim
  • \over-all strength or weakness of the evidence presented against a defendant is significant ... because it provides the context within which to assess whether the newly discovered evidence would have been a real factor in the jury's deliberations\
  • test that would exclude definitively defendants and victim as source of DNA profile, and instead would point to unidentified male as source of DNA, would not merely reduce weight that jury might give evidence, but would instead bar admission of such evidence
  • test that would exclude definitively defendants and victim as source of DNA profile, and instead would point to unidentified male as source of DNA, would not merely reduce weight that jury might give evidence, but instead would also bar admission of such evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gants, Spina, Cordy, Botsford, Duffly, Lenk, Hines

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.