Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Jones

Citations

  • 535 N.E.2d 221
  • 404 Mass. 339
  • 1989 Mass. LEXIS 78

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting argument that Federal Constitution requires more than in camera review of requested DSS records, and expressly declining to address unraised State law question
  • rejecting argument that Federal Constitution requires more than in camera review of requested dss records, and expressly declining to address unraised State law question
  • rejecting argument that Federal Constitution requires more than in camera re view of requested DSS records, and expressly declining to address unraised State law question
  • construing the statutes applicable to the social worker privilege and child abuse investigations to “allow a criminal defendant to obtain the investigation and evaluation reports which' ultimately led to his indictment and criminal prosecution”
  • defendant must “demonstrate a realistic and substantial possibility that [records] contained information helpful to his defense”
  • defendant demonstrated “realistic and substantial possibility” that file contained information helpful to his defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hennessey, Wilkins, Liacos, Abrams, Nolan, Lynch, O'Connor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.