Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2/12/1986
Commonwealth v. Lark
Citations
- 504 A.2d 1291
- 350 Pa. Super. 558
- 1986 Pa. Super. LEXIS 9478
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding previous homicide conviction does not become element of murder merely because sentencing enhancement will apply based on previous conviction
- holding previous homicide conviction does not become element of murder merely because sentencing enhancement will apply based on previous conviction
- stating that the statutory language of section 9715 is explicit and should be construed as written
- “The proof of prior conviction is a simple historical fact which may be ascertained through official documents.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wieand, Cercone, Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. GriffinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-06-24· cited 420×
- Commonwealth v. AponteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-08-19· cited 104×
- Commonwealth v. MorrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-10-01· cited 80×
- Commonwealth v. MarksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-12-18· cited 61×
- Commonwealth v. MedleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-01-27· cited 51×
- Commonwealth v. NeysmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-06-28· cited 48×
- Commonwealth v. DelligattiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-02-11· cited 37×
- Commonwealth v. MasonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-11-05· cited 29×
- Commonwealth v. RamosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-10-06· cited 11×
- Commonwealth v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-03-07· cited 9×
Cites
37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court· 1976-02-24· cited 16,859×
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court· 1979-04-30· cited 3,004×
- Proffitt v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 1,798×
- Spaziano v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 1,061×
- Gryger v. BurkeSupreme Court· 1948-10-11· cited 726×
- Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. HodorySupreme Court· 1977-05-31· cited 398×
- United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Gary Bowdach, Cross-AppelleeFifth Circuit· 1977-11-28· cited 199×
- Eutsey v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1980-04-24· cited 180×
- Commonwealth v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-06-10· cited 177×
- Talamas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-02-27· cited 99×
- Snider v. ThornburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-09-29· cited 96×
- Commonwealth v. GloverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1959-11-25· cited 83×
- Inendino v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1979-10-29· cited 81×
- United States v. James T. SchellTenth Circuit· 1982-12-02· cited 80×
- Commonwealth v. DrewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-04-27· cited 64×
- United States v. James Howard StewartSixth Circuit· 1976-06-07· cited 63×
- United States v. Arthur Edward WilliamsonFourth Circuit· 1977-12-29· cited 62×
- United States v. Davis, William, A/K/A \Country\ William DavisThird Circuit· 1983-08-01· cited 56×
- United States v. Joseph C. IlacquaSixth Circuit· 1977-11-30· cited 44×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.