Commonwealth v. Medley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• appellant was subject to custodial interrogation because his freedom of movement was restricted when he was frisked, placed in handcuffs, transported to police station and placed in secure waiting area to be questioned
• appellant was subject to custodial interrogation because his freedom of movement was restricted when he was frisked, placed in handcuffs, transported to police station and placed in secure waiting area to be questioned

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).