Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 6/9/2003

Commonwealth v. Jones

Citations

826 A.2d 900
2003 Pa. Super. 220
2003 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1361

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

indicating that such evidence “is not probative of the complainant’s willingness to commit sexual acts with [the defendant], for hire or for any other reason”
“If the Commonwealth has no opportunity to obtain appellate review of an adverse pre-trial interlocutory order implicating double jeopardy concerns, such review will never occur because the Commonwealth cannot try a defendant for a second time if the first prosecution results in an acquittal.”
“If the Commonwealth has no opportunity to obtain appellate review of an adverse pre-trial interlocutory order implicating double jeopardy concerns, such review will never occur because the Commonwealth cannot try a defendant for a second time if the first prosecution results in an acquittal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sole, McEwen, Hudock, Joyce, Stevens, Todd, Klein, Bender, Graci

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.