Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 3/28/1996

Commonwealth v. Gordon

Citations

673 A.2d 866
543 Pa. 513
1996 Pa. LEXIS 513

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that denial of a motion in limine to admit evidence falls within the judicially-established rule that the Commonwealth may appeal pretrial orders which substantially handicap prosecution
concluding that the other crimes evidence would not be unduly prejudicial where such evidence was required for the Commonwealth’s case
holding that the denial of a motion in limine seeking to admit evidence falls within the rule that the Commonwealth may appeal pretrial orders which terminate or substantially handicap the prosecution
holding that the denial of a motion in limine seeking to admit evidence falls within the rule that the Commonwealth may appeal pretrial orders which terminate or substantially handicap the prosecution
holding that denial of a motion in limine to admit evidence falls within the judicially established rule that the Commonwealth may appeal pretrial orders that substantially handicap the prosecution
holding evidence of appellant’s similar prior sexual assaults was not unduly prejudicial - 24 - J-A03006-21 & J-A03007-21 under Rule 404(b)(2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Flaherty, Zappala, Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.