Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Jones

Citations

  • 283 S.W.3d 665
  • 2009 Ky. LEXIS 27
  • 2009 WL 425891

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that palpable error relief is not available unless the error resulted in a manifest injustice
  • affirming a felon-in-possession conviction because a rifle’s operability wasn’t an element of the offense
  • “to preserve an error based upon the insufficiency of the evidence the defendant .... must renew his motion at the close of all evidence”
  • “[T]he question on appeal is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
  • “[T]o preserve an error based upon the insufficiency of the evidence the defendant must move for a directed verdict at the close of the Commonwealth's proof and must renew his motion at the close of all evidence: at the end of the defense case (if there is one
  • explaining the requisites of “manifest injustice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Abramson, Minton, Cunningham, Scott, Venters, Noble, Schroder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.