· 10/23/2001
Potts v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 37 Va. App. 64
- 553 S.E.2d 560
- 2001 Va. App. LEXIS 605
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying the Court's analysis in Andress , denying the operator's requested attorney fees because § 318.5(F) \does not permit the fees here ordered against Union because Union did not request a jury which is an express condition in the Act.\
- applying the Court's analysis in Andress , denying the operator's requested attorney fees because § 318.5(F) \does not permit the fees here ordered against Union because Union did not request a jury which is an express condition in the Act.\
- applying same distinction in nuisance context
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.