Court of Appeals of Maryland· 5/23/2011
Doe v. Roe
Citations
- 20 A.3d 787
- 419 Md. 687
- 2011 Md. LEXIS 303
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that enactment of a statute extending the statute of limitations was procedural and remedial and thus given retrospective application to the claims not yet barred by the previous statute of limitations
- “Provisions of law need not be codified in order to be legally binding.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harrell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Shailendra Kumar, P.A. v. DhandaCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-05-02· cited 64×
- Poole v. Coakley & Williams Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-10-27· cited 56×
- Johnson v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-02-25· cited 42×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-07-13· cited 29×
- Cathey v. DEPT. OF HEALTHCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-10-25· cited 10×
- Adedje v. Westat, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-09-06· cited 9×
- Duffy v. CBS Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2017-05-31· cited 8×
- Len Stoler, Inc. v. WisnerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-05-28· cited 6×
- Johnson v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-03-29· cited 4×
- Doe v. Hartford Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2015-07-07
- Kelly v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2024-06-27
- Key School v. BunkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2025-02-03
- Bd. of Education Of Harford Cnty. v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2025-02-03
- Archbishop of Washington v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2025-02-03
Cites
57 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court· 1965-04-26· cited 2,853×
- Stogner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 2003-06-26· cited 356×
- Sun Oil Co. v. WortmanSupreme Court· 1988-06-15· cited 308×
- State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-01-24· cited 153×
- Harig v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-11-21· cited 145×
- Dua v. Comcast Cable of Maryland, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-08-29· cited 135×
- State v. HirschNebraska Supreme Court· 1994-01-28· cited 133×
- Langston v. RiffeCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-06-28· cited 98×
- People v. FrazerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1999-10-20· cited 90×
- Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. Riverdale Heights Volunteer Fire Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-02-10· cited 86×
- Fioretti v. Maryland State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-08-31· cited 81×
- Doughty v. PrettymanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1959-02-16· cited 77×
- Shenker v. Laureate Education, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-11-12· cited 77×
- City of Boston v. Keene Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1989-12-14· cited 61×
- Allstate Insurance v. Kyong Ho KimCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-07-31· cited 60×
- Piselli v. 75th Street MedicalCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-10-08· cited 53×
- Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-05-10· cited 51×
- Grinder v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1850-12-15· cited 50×
- Polakoff v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-03-11· cited 49×
- Dobson v. Quinn Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1980-06-11· cited 49×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.