Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Jette

Citations

  • 818 A.2d 533
  • 2003 Pa. Super. 69
  • 2003 Pa. Super. LEXIS 294

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that testimony of a sexual assault victim alone is sufficient to convict
  • acknowledging that due process protections apply but further recognizing that “the Commonwealth must be allowed a reasonable measure of flexibility when faced with the special difficulties involved in ascertaining the date of an assault upon a young child”
  • acknowledging that due process protections apply but further recognizing that “the Commonwealth must be allowed a reasonable measure of flexibility when faced with the special difficulties involved in ascertaining the date of an assault upon a young child”
  • noting uncorroborated testimony of victim sufficient to convict on sexual offenses
  • “In the case of sexual offenses, the testimony of the victim alone is sufficient to convict, and medical evidence is not required if the fact finder believes the victim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sole, Todd, Olszewski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.