Commonwealth v. McClucas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that victim’s repeated sexual abuse by father over a five year period was “not susceptible to being dated within a ‘reasonable degree of certainty’ ”
• explaining that, because the sexual offenses occurred over a period of time, “we are not prepared to say that the lack of chronological specificity seriously encroached upon appellant’s ability to defend himself’
• upholding a span of fourteen months because, “Inasmuch as the crimes, in toto, occurred over a period of time, we are not prepared to say that the lack of chronological specificity seriously encroached upon appellant's ability to defend himself.”
• trial court did not err in admitting evidence of defendant’s sexual abuse of daughter over five-year period
• trial court did not err in admitting evidence of defendant's sexual abuse of daughter over five-year period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).