Commonwealth v. O'Black

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the burden always remains on the Appellant to ensure that the record is complete on appeal
• holding that it is an appellant’s responsibility to order the transcription required and ascertain its presence in the record
• holding that the burden always remains on the Appellant to ensure that the record is complete on appeal
• holding that “our review is limited to those facts which are contained in the certified record” and what is not contained in the certified record “does not exist for purposes of our review.”
• holding that “our review is limited to those facts which are contained in the certified record” and what is not contained in the certified record “does not exist for purposes of our review.”
• noting that we cannot review claims raised on appeal meaningfully unless we are provided with a full and complete certified record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).