Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Hobbs

Citations

  • 125 N.E.3d 59
  • 482 Mass. 538

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that testimony at issue constituted multilevel hearsay, but finding no prejudice because improper testimony was cumulative of other evidence
  • concluding tainted testimony likely did not influence the jury’s conclusion because the remaining evidence against the defendant was “substantial”
  • determining permissible parameters of time for CSLI searches is difficult and requires fact-intensive inquiry
  • no substantial likelihood of miscarriage of justice where erroneously admitted evidence did not likely influence jury's conclusion
  • no substantial likelihood of miscarriage of justice where testimony at issue was cumulative of other evidence and did not likely influence jury's conclusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gants, Gaziano, Budd, Cypher, Kafker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.