Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 11/21/1995

Commonwealth v. Fuller

Citations

421 Mass. 400
657 N.E.2d 1251
1995 Mass. LEXIS 453

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“The evidence supporting [the] finding of malice under the first prong is overwhelming. Thus, any errors as to the third prong malice instruction are irrelevant”
errors as to third prong malice instruction were “irrelevant” because “evidence supporting their finding of malice under the first prong is overwhelming”
“judge should explain the meaning of technical terms where that meaning is obscure and there is a possibility of confusion”
judge should explain meaning of technical terms where meaning is obscure and there is a possibility of confusion
\judge should explain the meaning of technical terms where that meaning is obscure and there is a possibility of confusion\
judge should explain meaning of technical terms where meaning is obscure and there is a possibility of confusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fried

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.