Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 9/29/1995

Commonwealth v. Hill

Citations

666 A.2d 642
542 Pa. 291
1995 Pa. LEXIS 970

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

observing that “it was solely within the province of the jury to determine whether [the appellant’s] two prior convictions for robbery served as a sufficient basis to conclude that she had a significant history of felony convictions”
observing that \it was solely within the province of the jury to determine whether [the appellant's] two prior convictions for robbery served as a sufficient basis to conclude that she had a significant history of felony convictions\
three aggravating circumstances and no mitigating circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Flaherty, Zappala, Cappy, Castille, Montemuro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.