Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Henkel

Citations

  • 938 A.2d 433
  • 2007 Pa. Super. 333
  • 2007 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3919

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “a prior inconsistent statement of a declarant is admissible to impeach the declarant.”
  • rejecting the appellant’s claim that “imposition of a life sentence for second- degree murder is ‘cruel and unusual punishment’ under both the United States and Pennsylvania Constitutions”
  • addressing due process challenge to evidentiary rulings of trial court on direct appeal
  • imposition of life sentence not unconstitutional “cruel and unusual punishment” under United States and Pennsylvania constitutions
  • failure to object to evidence of prior bad acts at trial results in waiver
  • rejecting identical claim based upon Middleton

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elliott, Melvin, Tamilia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.