Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 4/29/2005

Commonwealth v. Hall

Citations

872 A.2d 1177
582 Pa. 526
2005 Pa. LEXIS 907

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that three- prong standard for reviewing ineffectiveness claims applies to the performance of counsel at any level of representation
holding that three-prong standard for reviewing ineffectiveness claims applies to the performance of counsel at any level of representation
holding that three-prong standard for reviewing ineffectiveness claims applies to the performance of counsel at any level of representation
concluding that statements appended to appellant’s brief had not been sworn to by the declarant before an officer authorized to administer oaths, and thus, could not be characterized as affidavits
holding bald, undeveloped arguments fail to satisfy the appellant’s burden of establishing ineffective assistance of trial counsel claim
holding bald, undeveloped arguments fail to satisfy the appellant’s burden of establishing ineffective assistance of trial counsel claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor, Eakin, Baer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.